Reviewed by Jeanne
In 1954, New Zealand was rocked by news of the brutal murder
of a woman by her daughter and her daughter’s friend. The trial was a sensation because of the
nature of the murder, but the girls’ behavior during the trial—smiling,
laughing, and seemingly unrepentant—intensified the scrutiny. Their close relationship inspired much
speculation. The event was one of those
seminal moments in a country’s history that shaped a generation, much like the
kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby did in the U.S. a couple of decades earlier.
The case remains compelling to this day, more because of the
personalities involved than the brutality of the crime. Juliet Hulme was the daughter of two
prominent British citizens. Her father,
a well-known physicist, was the Rector of the local college, while her mother
was a marriage counselor and had a radio program. The family was part of the social elite. The London Blitz and Juliet’s health problems
had kept her away from her family for several years, time she had spent in the
Caribbean and South Africa. At age 13,
she was thought well enough to join the family in New Zealand. Meanwhile, Pauline Rieper had undergone
health issues of her own with osteomyelitis, which also left her somewhat
alienated from her family. Unlike
Juliet, Pauline’s family was definitely lower middle class, but the two girls
shared a fierce intelligence and a love of film and music stars as well as a
sense they were special and meant for great things. They believed they would go
to Hollywood where they would write movies and act in them alongside their beloved
movie stars.
The girls had also developed an elaborate fantasy
world. They believed they were special, able
to see the heaven they dubbed the “Fourth World”, an ability Pauline believed
only about ten people in the world had.
They created their own religion, with gods and saints composed of the
performers they most admired: James
Mason, Mario Lanza, and a changing cast of others. Pauline wrote, “Juliet and I decided the
Christian religion had become too much of a farce and we decided to make up one
of our own.”
The intensity of the relationship began to disturb some of
the adults, including Pauline’s mother.
They felt the girls were too fixated on one another. Things really began to fall apart when Juliet’s
father lost his job and his marriage, and the family planned to move back to
England. Both girls were determined that Pauline should accompany the Hulmes.
Honorah Parker Rieper, Pauline’s mother, was equally determined that she should
not.
This was given as the motive for Honorah’s murder: the girls
believed if she were removed, so would all obstacles to the girls’ leaving
together.
Peter Graham was shielded from news of the event as a child,
but when he began his legal career he found a colleague had actually worked on
the case. His interest was piqued, but
it was decades before he began to examine the case in depth. From my point of view, it was well worth the
wait. Graham brings both honesty and
genuine curiosity to the subject, writing without preconceived notions of what
he would find. He researched extensively and it shows, but the writing is so
clear that the reader never feels bogged down in detail. Graham uses Pauline’s diaries to provide
insight on the girls as well many interviews with those still living and as
much documented material as possible.
This was not my first book choice when I decided to read
about the case. In a clear case of
judging a book by its title, I was put off by the name Anne Perry and the
Murder of the Century. I didn’t want
to read a book geared toward scandal and sensationalism, and the title
indicated to me that the book was trying to cash in on Perry’s name—and that is
most definitely NOT what the book is about.
Juliet Hulme’s life after the trial gets only a brief chapter and the
"Anne Perry" name is invoked very little.
In fact, when the book was first published the title was So
Brilliantly Clever, reflecting a line from Pauline’s diaries. I can say without reservation that, had Juliet’s
new identity never been revealed, I would have enjoyed the book just as much. However, Graham does call some of Perry’s
statements into question, such as the assertion that part of the girls’ release
was that they have no contact with each other; in fact, they were released “without
condition.”
This book is more concerned with the psychology of the crime
along with social context than sensationalism.
It’s well written and compelling, and certainly memorable. He does draw some comparisons between this
case and the notorious Leopold/Loeb case, based on some of the personality
traits of the murderers. (The American title also reflects that, as the best
known book on that case is The Crime of the Century: The Leopold-Loeb Case by Hal Higdon.)
Graham doesn’t offer any simple solutions. In fact, one of my favorite parts is near the
end of the book in which various theories are presented, including some
contemporary with the crime as well as more modern views. Graham leaves the reader with questions that
are unanswerable but are still interesting to ponder: what would have happened if the girls had
never met? Or if Pauline’s mother had
agreed to allow her to go with the Hulmes? Would the girls’ murderous impulses
have emerged or was it all a perfect storm?
The book also offers the reader some closure on others whose
lives were affected by the crime. While
The Search for Anne Perry by Joanne Drayton provided some information on the Hulmes, this book
was more thorough in its approach and addressed what became of the
Rieper/Parker household. After the
murder, it was discovered that Pauline’s parents were not legally married, making
the children illegitimate and causing the struggling family even more financial
difficulty.
In the end the book also acknowledged some themes I had
wondered about, including the fact that both Parker and Hulme apparently became
quite devout in a religion after their incarceration: Parker became Roman
Catholic and Hulme converted to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints. Graham doesn’t belabor the point
but does note that the religion the girls created has some parallels to the
more orthodox religions they eventually adopted.
I would highly recommend this book to anyone with an
interest in true crime, especially of the historical variety.
(Note: "Heavenly Creatures," the film by Peter Jackson, is based on the Parker-Hulme case.)
No comments:
Post a Comment